Does Smugmug Have a Daily Upload Limit?

I've spent the terminal several days doing the fourth dimension consuming chore of reformatting and redirecting all the sometime images on my site that signal to Flickr and my self hosted photos, to Smugmug. I mentioned this on Twitter and I've gotten a lot of questions every bit to why I'm leaving Flickr and my self-hosted site for SmugMug. Then I figured I'd explicate everything in as much particular every bit I tin can. The more I investigated it, SmugMug actually is a no-brainer for me. Nonetheless, I also understand why it wouldn't be for anybody.

Like most people, I began using Flickr as my photo hosting solution considering it was free, piece of cake to use, and well known. If y'all own a point and shoot camera and just have casual photos, Flickr is great. The 100mb limit for storage each month is more than enough for almost people. In fact, since I've started using Flickr, Facebook has surpassed Flickr in the total number of photos stored. Facebook, like Flickr, is costless and easy to apply if you want to share photos with your friends.

Eventually, I institute information technology necessary to increment my storage limits on Flickr and I purchased a Pro account, which is $20/year. $xx/year is honestly a nifty deal considering you become unlimited everything. The real power of Flickr however, is the huge community of people which utilise information technology. There are millions of members and thousands of groups. For a catamenia of time, I was submitting my photos to groups and getting tons of people to wait at them. Eventually, participating in groups grew deadening. Some groups have hundreds of photos submitted every twenty-four hour period and most of the people who comment on your photos are simply doing and then because the group rules require you to annotate on ii or 3 photos for every i y'all post. Information technology was all sort of hollow and fake.

Notwithstanding, even if you don't participate in the Flickr groups you can still become value just hosting your images in that location. As I became a better photographer and had more images, however, in that location were several things about Flickr which began to carp me.

1) Flickr is the #i place to steal images.

Tons of blogs and websites take images off of Flickr and so they can use them. That doesn't bother me then much, just when people link back they provide the links dorsum to Flickr, not my website. In fact, Flickr is an incredibly closed arrangement and they don't like to link out or promote the websites of its members. You get one link in your contour which is usually well hidden. The search engine in Flickr makes the process of finding the images yous want to steal almost trivial.

I don't usually mind if people link to my stuff. If I post a video, I don't care if everyone in the globe embeds information technology in their site. It is pretty clear who fabricated the video and I put my URL in every i. Fifty-fifty sites which steal my RSS feed don't bother me so much because it is piece of cake to prove I was the original writer. Photos are unlike, still. It is hard to trace ownership of a photo. I realize that if you put photos on the cyberspace you sort of have to live with that to a certain extent, simply there are things you can do to limit it.

Flickr has no choice for restricting access to the original size files. It is all or aught. Either you make every version of an prototype private or you brand them all public. Also, they don't have whatsoever watermarking capabilities built in. Many of the people who have become really big on Flickr, like Rebekka Guðleifsdóttir, take either left Flickr or seriously scaled dorsum their interest. If you lot want to have any sort of protection on your images, Flickr isn't the identify to be.

There are many blogs which survive on using the photography of other people. I recall those sites are extremely lame. They usually ignore artistic eatables notices and treat everything on Flickr as being public domain. Moreover, even if you did want to put your images up with a creative eatables license with attribution, near all attribution ends up going to some Flickr nickname with links pointing back to Flickr. Y'all have no control over how y'all get attributed.

SmugMug provides a great amount of control over your images and how y'all can protect them. You can put watermarks on images and you tin block access to images above a certain size. In today'southward internet world, the easiest thing to exercise to protect your images is to simply avoid Flickr because that is the ane cease shop for people who want to have them.

2) Flickr has aught customization.

Your Flickr page is what they give you. For the well-nigh part, every Flickr user page looks the same. They don't even offer themes you can use to change the background color of your page. In Flickr, you can't hands provide links to your website and you lot can't add together links to other sites you might be on like Twitter or Facebook. Flickr is its own world and doesn't desire people leaving the reservation.

What I want is for people to visit my website and my photograph hosting solution to be integrated into my site. Flickr does nil to facilitate this. Smugmug goes way out of their way to do this. Non merely tin can y'all customize your SmugMug page nevertheless y'all want, you can also map your ain domain proper name to SmugMug to make the integration seamless. Once information technology is up and running, travel-photos.Everything-Everywhere.com will point to my SmugMug page and it will have the same basic design equally my website.

3) SmugMug makes information technology very piece of cake to sell prints

Eventually, I'd like to try to bring in some money selling prints. SmugMug makes this very easy to practise. At that place are a wide range of photo sizes and products y'all tin buy and they likewise have multiple printers you tin can cull. Because it is then customizable yous can design your store how you want. They handle all the processing and send yous a cheque later. You can order prints from Flickr, but you can't really gear up up a shop.

4) SmugMug has peachy customer service and a peachy community

Almost everyone I've spoken to who uses SmugMug is a serious lensman and loves the company. The user base of operations is only a fraction of the size of Flickr's, but the quality is much college. The company is active in the user forums and are very quick to respond to customer service questions. Flickr isn't very innovative. The service hasn't changed very much since they were purchased by Yahoo.

v) Smugmug allows for like shooting fish in a barrel image resizing.

Most people might not list this as a big deal, but I really like information technology. I can accept any image from Smugmug and re-size it to whatsoever size past but putting the size I want in the URL. It is that piece of cake. In the future if I ever want to modify the size of my daily photos to something larger, I but demand to practise a search and supplant on everything and change …600×600.jpg to ….jpg. That is pretty prissy. Flickr only allows for images of a few defined sizes.

Summary

If you but own a point and shoot camera and just want a place to store images online to share with friends and family unit, I'd recommend uploading everything to Facebook. This is the best way to share with people you know and Facebook will store unlimited photos for free (as of now).

If you are a bit more advanced and want to talk with other photographers and share your work with them, and then I'd give Flickr a try. Flickr'south biggest force is its large user base. Facebook has overtaken it as the largest photo hosting site, but it is nevertheless pretty big. Every photographer should accept some sort of presence on Flickr if only to take part in groups.

If you care securely about how your images are displayed and you want maximum control over your portfolio, I'd get with Smugmug. It is more expensive, but it is worth it. If you are a photograph blogger, I'd strongly recommend Smugmug.

jamesonmest1943.blogspot.com

Source: https://everything-everywhere.com/moving-to-smugmug-from-flickr/

0 Response to "Does Smugmug Have a Daily Upload Limit?"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel